Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5653 14
Original file (NR5653 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

JDR
Docket No: 5653-14
28 May 2015

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.

A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 28 May 2015. After careful consideration of your
application, the Board concluded that your application was not
timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of
justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina
timely manner. Specifically, you provided a statement that
“your mental state was found unfit and you have done everything
in your power to better yourself” as a reason for waiving the
statute of limitations. The Board determined this was an
insufficient reason to waive the statute since there is no
evidence provided that indicates you were unable to file your
application within the three years from when you learned of your
characterization of service.

You may request reconsideration of this decision within one year
from the date of the Board's decision. However, your request
must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not
reasonably available to you when you submitted your application.
Further, the evidence must pertain to the timeliness of your
application or to its merits. Absent such additional evidence,
further review of your application is not possible.

Sinceyely,

ROBERT J. ~O’NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5986 14

    Original file (NR5986 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 May 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. Specifically, you provided a statement that “you were told that you could never get an upgrade and you saw no need to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6122 14

    Original file (NR6122 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 May 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Specifically, you provided a statement that “changes in your life for the good of humanity are a plus in your life and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5937 14

    Original file (NR5937 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 May 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Specifically, you provided a statement that “you discovered that cases such as yours should have...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5642 14

    Original file (NR5642 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 May 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Specifically, you provided a statement that “the passage of time does not lessen the error or injustice” asa reason for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5955 14

    Original file (NR5955 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JDR Docket No: 5955-14 28 May 2015 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 May 2015. After careful consideration of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5649 14

    Original file (NR5649 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 May 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. Specifically, you provided a statement that “although your actions were unlawful, you feel that you deserve leniency...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5566 14

    Original file (NR5566 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although your application was not filed ina timely manner, the Board found it in the interest of justice to waive the statute of limitations and consider your application on its merits. A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 March 2015. You may request reconsideration of this decision within one year from the date of the Board’s decision.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR622 14

    Original file (NR622 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 January 2015. After careful consideration of | your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. Specifically, you provided a statement that noted in part, that ‘your discharged was based on your first...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR625 14

    Original file (NR625 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 January 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a ‘timely manner. Specifically, you provided a statement that noted in part, that ‘you were discharged without much thought given...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR722 14

    Original file (NR722 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 January 2015. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed; and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. Specifically, you provided the statement ‘I have become a productive citizen in my community.’ as the basis...